Call 214-506-0671
Recent Blog Posts
USCIS E-Filing Rule: What You Need to Know About Filing Immigration Forms Online
USCIS UPDATE: E-Filing Rule
Starting this month, USCIS is moving toward requiring more immigration forms to be filed online. If you're applying for a green card, asylum, citizenship, or any other immigration benefit, this change will eventually affect you. Here's what's happening and what you need to do now.
What Changed?
On August 11, 2026, USCIS announced a new rule that lets them require electronic filing for immigration forms. This is a big shift—for years, people could mail paper forms to USCIS lockbox addresses. That option is going away.
The rule doesn't make all forms online-only immediately. Instead, USCIS can now require e-filing for any form that has been available online for at least 180 days. When they decide to make a form mandatory e-filing, they have to give you 60 days' notice first.
Which Forms Will This Affect?
Eventually, this could affect almost every immigration benefit:
- Green card applications (Adjustment of Status applications)
Your TPS Is Ending - What You Need To Know
What is Temporary Protected Status (TPS)?
Temporary Protected Status (TPS) is a special immigration benefit that allows foreign nationals from designated countries experiencing ongoing armed conflict, environmental disasters, or epidemics to live and work in the United States on a temporary basis. TPS designations are time-limited and subject to renewal or termination by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS).
TPS Has Recently Ended or Is Ending
As of July 2026, Temporary Protected Status for the following countries has ended or is ending:
Countries Where TPS Has Already Ended:
• Afghanistan (ended July 2025)
• Cameroon (ended August 2025)
• Nepal (ended August 2025)
• Nicaragua (ended September 2025)
Countries Where TPS Is Ending in July/August 2026:
• Syria (July 24, 2026)
• Somalia (July 24, 2026)
• Yemen (July 24, 2026)
USCIS Just Changed Asylum Cases Forever. Here's What You Need to Know
USCIS announced a major rule change today-July 27, 2026. It's already in effect. They can now skip your asylum interview entirely and send your case straight to immigration court without ever talking to you first. If you're applying for asylum or thinking about applying, you need to understand what this means for you right now.
How Asylum Used to Work
There are two paths to asylum in the United States.
If you're already living in the country and you want asylum, you apply to USCIS directly. This is called affirmative asylum. You file your paperwork, they schedule an interview with an asylum officer, and you get a chance to sit down and tell your story. The officer listens. They ask questions. If they believe you qualify for asylum, they approve you and you stay. If they think you don't qualify, they refer your case to immigration court—but you get another chance to present your case in front of a judge.
If you're in removal proceedings—if ICE arrested you or you were caught at the border—you're fighting deportation in immigration court. This is called defensive asylum. A judge presides. An ICE attorney argues that you should be deported. You fight back. It's adversarial and formal.
DHS Rescinds 2022 Public Charge Rule: What Green Card Applicants Need to Know Before September 18, 2026
Breaking: Major Changes to Green Card Public Charge Rules in 2026
On July 20, 2026, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) announced a critical policy shift that will fundamentally change how USCIS evaluates green card applicants. The agency has officially rescinded the 2022 public charge regulation, replacing it with a broader discretionary framework that gives immigration officers significantly more authority to deny applications.
If you're applying for a green card or planning to submit an adjustment of status application, this change directly affects you. Here's everything you need to know.
What is the Public Charge Rule?
The public charge doctrine is a longstanding immigration law principle that makes someone deportable if they're deemed likely to become a burden on public resources. For decades, immigration officers have used various standards to determine what "public charge" means—but those standards have been inconsistent and controversial.
ICE Ordered to Stop Most Traffic Stops: What You Need to Know
Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin ordered U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to halt most traffic stops and vehicle-based immigration enforcement operations. This major shift in immigration enforcement strategy follows two fatal shootings by ICE agents in Texas and Maine during routine traffic stops in July 2026.
This policy change represents one of the largest restructurings of federal immigration enforcement in recent years. If you're affected by ICE enforcement or concerned about immigration issues, here's what you need to know.
Why ICE Stopped Conducting Most Traffic Stops
Two fatal incidents exposed serious flaws in ICE traffic stop procedures:
Marrying a U.S. Citizen No Longer Protects You From Deportation
For decades, spouses of U.S. citizens held a privileged place in immigration law: no visa caps, and often no need to have maintained legal status to adjust. That era is over. Can you be deported if you're married to a U.S. citizen in 2026? USCIS spokesman Zach Kahler recently confirmed the answer is yes - a pending or even approved I-130 petition "does not confer any immigration status." Anyone who entered without inspection or overstayed a visa remains subject to deportation, marriage notwithstanding.
Why a Marriage-Based Green Card No Longer Stops Deportation
- USCIS marriage interviews are adversarial now. Waiver rates for marriage-based green card interviews have dropped from over 90% to roughly 6–9%. Officers increasingly interview spouses separately and compare answers for inconsistencies.
Supreme Court Upholds Birthright Citizenship: What the Ruling Means for Immigrant Families
On June 30, 2026, the Supreme Court ruled in Trump v. Barbara that children born in the United States are citizens at birth under the Fourteenth Amendment, regardless of their parents' immigration status. The decision strikes down Executive Order 14160, which President Trump signed on his first day in office in an attempt to deny citizenship to children born to parents who are undocumented or present on temporary visas.
For families who have spent the past year and a half uncertain about what this order meant for their children, the ruling resolves the central legal question. Birthright citizenship remains the law of the land.
What the Court Decided
The Citizenship Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment states that all persons born in the United States and subject to its jurisdiction are citizens. Chief Justice John Roberts wrote the majority opinion, joined by Justice Amy Coney Barrett and the Court's three liberal justices, Elena Kagan, Sonia Sotomayor, and Ketanji Brown Jackson. The majority held that children born here to parents who are unlawfully or temporarily present are subject to United States jurisdiction and are citizens at birth, consistent with the Court's 1898 decision in United States v. Wong Kim Ark.
Supreme Court Dismantles TPS and Asylum Protections in Two 6-3 Rulings
Yesterday, June 25, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court issued two decisions that fundamentally reshape immigration law for millions of people. Both rulings favored the Trump administration 6-3. Together, they eliminate temporary protections for hundreds of thousands already in the United States and strip asylum access for migrants arriving at the southern border.
What Happened: The Two Rulings
Ruling 1: TPS Can Be Terminated (Mullin v. Doe)
The Supreme Court overturned lower court orders that had blocked the government's termination of Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Haiti and Syria. The decision affects approximately 350,000 Haitians and 4,000 Syrians who are currently living and working legally in the United States.
Federal Court Strikes Down USCIS Asylum and Benefits Freezes: What You Need to Know
On June 5, 2026, a federal court in Rhode Island ruled that USCIS had no legal authority to freeze thousands of pending immigration applications and asylum cases. The ruling was final as of June 11, 2026, and it applies nationwide immediately.
If you have been waiting for months without a decision on your green card, asylum application, work permit, or other immigration benefit, this ruling may affect your case. Here is what happened and what it means for you.
What USCIS Froze
Starting in December 2025, USCIS issued policy memos that created two major freezes.
The first freeze was on asylum applications. USCIS ordered a hold on all asylum cases from certain countries, saying it needed time for a "comprehensive review." The policy memo said the hold would stay in place "until lifted by the USCIS Director through a subsequent memorandum." That memorandum never came. Even though USCIS later said on its website that some countries were no longer frozen, the official policy was never rescinded.
The 39-Country Visa Ban and the June 5 Court Ruling: What It Means for Your Immigration Case
The expansion of U.S. travel restrictions in January 2026 created significant uncertainty for immigrants worldwide. But a federal court decision issued on June 5, 2026, has fundamentally changed how these restrictions affect pending immigration applications. If you are a national of one of the 39 designated countries, or if someone you know is, it is critical to understand both what has changed and what remains in effect.
The Travel Ban: What Remains in Place
On December 16, 2025, President Trump issued Presidential Proclamation 10998, which expanded U.S. travel restrictions from 19 countries to 39 countries effective January 1, 2026. This proclamation did two things:
Our firm provides representation for people throughout the United States. From our Concord office, we serve clients in San Francisco, Oakland, San Rafael, San Pablo, Richmond, Berkeley, Alameda, San Leandro, Hayward, Fremont, San Bruno, San Mateo, Palo Alto, San Jose, Mountain View, Milpitas, Cupertino, Santa Clara, and Campbell. Additionally, we serve clients in Texas cities including, Plano, Frisco, Allen, Carrollton, Farmers Branch, Richardson, Garland, Mesquite, Irving, Grand Prairie, Arlington, Euless, Bedford, Grapevine, Coppell, and Fort Worth.
Results listed are not a guarantee or indication of future case results.
